|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Akane Togenada
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
6
   |
Posted - 2017.01.13 11:05:07 -
[1] - Quote
Akis Talanas wrote:This is the typical ftp complaining in EVERY game that is or becomes ftp ....
"We want MORE...we want to do the same as a paid account,because we don't pay,we want it just because we honor the server with our delightful presense"......
or....
Give us microtransacrions so we can pay MORE a subscriber would pay for the same stuff.....we are so smart......we praise ourselves for not wanting a monthly subscription because that would BIND us to the game so we pay 1/3 MORE...SO smart are we......you just don't understand our genius.......
Ridiculous.......
Can-Št Like this post enough. As a player who have always chosen MMO:s with subscription rather then microtransactions I can-Št wrap my head around all the hate subscriptions recieve. Just because a payment system is older doesn-Št mean it's worse and in this case it's actually alot better. Microtransactions are cancer to the gaming industry and will destroy it for all players eventually if given the chance.
|
Akane Togenada
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2017.01.13 11:08:57 -
[2] - Quote
Glabeal Semah wrote:Lan Wang wrote:Glabeal Semah wrote:Why is there no option to BUY a ship? Like in RSI?
For example, an Astero could cost 100 eur. You get the right to fly it (as an alpha), one BP (?), and the right to buy and train the skills.
If you like to further limit things (making more money) you put a limit of 20 (?) Asteros. After you've lost it 20 times, you pay again 100 eur.
It just an example! And let's remember 100eur is about 7 months of subbing. Any thoughts on this?
we dont need microtransactions like that, it is total cancer Wouldn't be so sure. You'd still have NPC killing bought ships; NPCs can get 'smarter'; there would still be corps like CODE making 'rules' in high-sec, and so on. Really, I think someone is 100% afraid of this. It's FEAR (and greed), not reason. Why wouldn't this be a win-win? Eve gets the cash (and they make sure ships are blown, as they do TODAY) and the player flies the ships he, she likes.
Your idea would be P2W which is the only system that's even worse the F2P. Also how would you decide what skills should be 'unlocked'. The only skills you need to fly an Astero is Gallente and Amarr Frigate III, are those the skills you mean ?
|
Akane Togenada
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2017.01.13 11:44:34 -
[3] - Quote
Akis Talanas wrote:Why is a "just leave them alone" so hard to understand for some people here?
I don't get this.....
Is your fear to have to low kill rates?
Is it that you fear the opportunity to loose if you have no pve fittet prey anymore?
Is it that you fear to open pandoras box filled with even MORE -sigh- mmo solo mode parts?
Is it that you fear EVE could change and you loose your neck of the woods?
What is it?
Tell me.....
Please.....
I can't await your pure wisdom.....
As a player who enjoy the PvE aspect of EVE (and exploration in particular) all I can say is that if your demands for a safer game where met I would instantly quit. Without hunters out there scouting for me and other 'prey' all the exitement would be gone and exploration would essentially become RNG Mining instead. I'd also hate to not have the possibilty to later switch roles and become the hunter instead.
You are obviously free to speak your mind but please don-Št try to sound like a spokesperson for all PvE-focused players because you clearly is not. |
|
|
| |
|